Michigan's SI-OCP Shrinks Safety Margins for Drones Flying Through Wind

A new conformal prediction method tightens safety margins for adaptive controllers, letting a learning quadcopter squeeze through gaps a worst-case bound would block.

·
·
·
Michigan's SI-OCP Shrinks Safety Margins for Drones Flying Through WindPRO
Read2 min
TypePaper
  • SI-OCP calibrates disturbance bounds online for safety-critical control of systems that adapt their own dynamics.
  • Uses an integral non-conformity score so no state derivative measurements are required for the label.
  • Maintains P staggered conformal thresholds to deliver multi-step horizon coverage, not just one-step.
  • Quadcopter demo with all-layer DNN adaptation hits 98.77 percent disturbance coverage against a 90 percent target.
  • With adaptation frozen, the method widens tubes automatically and the planner safely reroutes around a narrow gap.
  • Code and the paper are available; accepted to CDC 2026.

SI-OCP tightens safety tubes as control models adapt

Safety-critical controllers often convert uncertain model error into a fixed worst-case disturbance bound. That approach supports formal guarantees, but the resulting reachable sets and safety tubes can block feasible paths. Researchers at the University of Michigan propose Staggered Integral Online Conformal Prediction, or SI-OCP, which recalibrates the disturbance bound while the controller learns changing dynamics.

The SI-OCP paper was accepted to CDC 2026, and the authors released a GitHub repository. Their demonstration combines an online-adapted deep neural network with robust tube model predictive control, or MPC, on a quadcopter flying through spatially and temporally varying wind.

When calibration loses its labels

Conformal prediction uses a model’s previous errors to calibrate an interval or set for future predictions. Online conformal prediction adapts this process to sequential, potentially non-independent data and targets a user-specified long-run miss rate. That property suits controllers operating under drift, where model errors change during a mission.

Dynamics adaptation creates a labeling problem because conventional online conformal prediction expects the true error after each prediction. The natural label is the instantaneous residual between the system’s actual state derivative and the learned model’s estimate. A quadcopter typically measures quantities such as position, velocity, and attitude, while the required derivative-level residual remains unobserved.

MPC creates a separate coverage problem because it plans several steps ahead. A one-step error bound does not establish that the disturbance remains covered throughout the planning horizon, yet robust MPC needs a horizon-wide bound to construct a tube containing the possible trajectories around its nominal plan.

Pro article

This story is for Pro members

You've reached the end of the free preview. Upgrade to AlphaSignal Pro to read the full article - and everything else behind the paywall.

Trending
  • No trending articles

Comments

avatar

Next Reads